Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DePaulo, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hairfield, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DePaulo, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hairfield, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 3, 276-285 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292183003
© 1992 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Expressiveness and Expressive Control

Bella M. DePaulo

University of Virginia, bmd{at}virginia.edu

Amy L. Blank

University of Virginia

Gregory W. Swaim

University of Virginia

Joan G. Hairfield

University of Virginia

Dispositionally expressive and unexpressive male subjects told truths and lies under low and high scrutiny. Subjects acted expressive, inhibited, and naturally. Judges rated subjects' performances. Subjects were able to regulate their expressiveness deliberately, but they were less successful when more highly scrutinized. Dispositionally expressive subjects appeared more expressive and attractive than unexpressive subjects. Unlike unexpressive subjects, they did not appear any less attractive when trying to act inhibited than when trying to act expressive, nor did they appear any more deceptive when lying than when telling the truth. Unexpressive people, even when trying to act expressive, did not appear as expressive as expressive people when the latter were acting naturally. Similarly, expressive people, even when trying to act inhibited, did not appear as inhibited as the unexpressive people acting naturally. Differences in expressiveness were conveyed most compellingly in channels that included nonverbal cues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. S. Berry, J. W. Pennebaker, J. S. Mueller, and W. S. Hiller
Linguistic Bases of Social Perception
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1997; 23(5): 526 - 537.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. S. Berry and S. J. Misovich
Methodological Approaches to the Study of Social Event Perception
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1994; 20(2): 139 - 152.
[Abstract]