This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Newman, L. S. Articles by Vookles, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Newman, L. S. Articles by Vookles, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Self-Guide Strength and Emotional Vulnerability: Birth Order as a Moderator of Self-Affect Relations

Princeton University

Tory Higgins

Columbia University

Jennifer Vookles

New York University

This study tested hypotheses derived from developmental extensions of Higgins's self-discrepancy theory. Discrepancies between one's actual self and ideal-other self (a self-guide consisting of attributes someone would ideally like the individual to possess) cause dejection, whereas discrepancies with the ought-other self (beliefs about attributes someone thinks one ought to ham) cause agitation. Self-guides also differ in strength (the accessibility of, coherence of, and commitment to a self-guide). Consideration of the features of parent-child interaction hypothesized to increase self-guide strength led to the prediction that first-borns would have strong "other"-standpoint self-guides and that their discrepancies would be more highly correlated with emotional distress than those of later-borns. It was also predicted that first-borns would have fewer such self-discrepancies. Both predictions were supported. Many birth-order findings are consistent with these results.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Evans and R. E. Petty Self-Guide Framing and Persuasion: Responsibly Increasing Message Processing to Ideal Levels Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2003; 29(3): 313 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Robins and J. Boldero Relational Discrepancy Theory: The Implications of Self-Discrepancy Theory for Dyadic Relationships and for the Emergence of Social Structure Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2003; 7(1): 56 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Boldero and J. Francis Goals, Standards, and the Self: Reference Values Serving Different Functions Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2002; 6(3): 232 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Pomerantz and L. S. Newman Looking in on the Children: Using Developmental Psychology as a Tool for Hypothesis Testing and Model Building in Social Psychology Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 300 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]