Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Fenaughty, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by West, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Fenaughty, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 4, 473-484 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292184012
© 1992 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Conference

Publication Trends in JPSP: Stability and Change in Topics, Methods, and Theories Across Two Decades

Stephen G. West

Arizona State University

Jason T. Newsom

Arizona State University

Andrea M. Fenaughty

Arizona State University

Content analyses of a sample consisting of approximately 30% of the articles published in the journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 1968 and in 1988 are reported. The proportion of articles classified in the section Attitudes and Social Cognition has shown little change, whereas the proportion classified in Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes has decreased and the proportion in Personality Process and Individual Differences has increased over the two-decade period. Examination of several characteristics of research methodology indicates that both gains and losses have occurred and that the judged difficulty of conducting single studies has not changed Gender representative ness of subjects, but not authors, has improved. More qualitative observations suggest that theory in social psychology may have become less integrative. Issues in statistical analysis in the field are addressed The authors' mixed picture of progress in personality and social psychology is contrasted with the more optimistic view presented by Reis and Stiller (1992 [this issue]).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W. B. Swann Jr. and C. Seyle
Personality Psychology's Comeback and Its Emerging Symbiosis With Social Psychology
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2005; 31(2): 155 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. C. Sherman, A. M. Buddie, K. L. Dragan, C. M. End, and L. J. Finney
Twenty Years of PSPB: Trends in Content, Design, and Analysis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1999; 25(2): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. B. Ruscher, E. Y. Hammer, and E. D. Hammer
Forming Shared Impressions Through Conversation: An Adaptation of the Continuum Model
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1996; 22(7): 705 - 720.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. S. Uleman and G. Weary
Survey of Doctoral Programs in Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1995; 21(3): 245 - 255.
[Abstract]