Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by liberman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chaiken, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by liberman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chaiken, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 6, 669-679 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292186002
© 1992 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Health Messages

Akiva liberman

New York University

Shelly Chaiken

New York University

Subectsfor whom a health threat was relvant or irrelevant were recruited and matched on prior beliefs in the health threat. Following exposure to either a low- or a high-threat message, high-relvance subjects were less likely to believe in the threat. Consistent with earlier work, no evidence was found to suggest that defensive inattention to the messages mediated subjects' final beliefs. Instead, processing measures suggested that highrelevance subects processed threatening parts of both messages in a biased fashion. The relationship between biased judgment and biased processing is discussed, as are the difficulties in documenting the latter


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek
Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 147 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
L. Kahlor, S. Dunwoody, R. J. Griffin, and K. Neuwirth
Seeking and Processing Information about Impersonal Risk
Science Communication, December 1, 2006; 28(2): 163 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Gabriel, M. Carvallo, K. K. Dean, B. Tippin, and J. Renaud
How I See Me Depends on How I See We: The Role of Attachment Style in Social Comparison
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2005; 31(11): 1561 - 1572.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. R. Harris and L. Napper
Self-Affirmation and the Biased Processing of Threatening Health-Risk Information
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2005; 31(9): 1250 - 1263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. N. Cappella, C. Lerman, A. Romantan, and L. Baruh
News about Genetics and Smoking: Priming, Family Smoking History, and News Story Believability on Inferences of Genetic Susceptibility to Tobacco Addiction
Communication Research, August 1, 2005; 32(4): 478 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
R. Ho, G. Davidson, and V. Ghea
Motives for the Adoption of Protective Health Behaviours for Men and Women: An Evaluation of the Psychosocial-Appraisal Health Model
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2005; 10(3): 373 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. de Hoog, W. Stroebe, and J. B. F. de Wit
The Impact of Fear Appeals on Processing and Acceptance of Action Recommendations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Renner
Biased Reasoning: Adaptive Responses to Health Risk Feedback
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 384 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. H. H. J. Das, J. B. F. de Wit, and W. Stroebe
Fear Appeals Motivate Acceptance of Action Recommendations: Evidence for a Positive Bias in the Processing of Persuasive Messages
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2003; 29(5): 650 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H.-P. Erb, G. Bohner, S. Rank, and S. Einwiller
Processing Minority and Majority Communications: The Role of Conflict with Prior Attitudes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2002; 28(9): 1172 - 1182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
A. El-Alayli, E. S. Park, L. A. Messe, and N. L. Kerr
Having to Take a Stand: The Interactive Effects of Task Framing and Source Status on Attitudes
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2002; 5(3): 233 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. Bohner and T. Weinerth
Negative Affect Can Increase or Decrease Message Scrutiny: The Affect Interpretation Hypothesis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2001; 27(11): 1417 - 1428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. A. K. Sherman, L. D. Nelson, and C. M. Steele
Do Messages about Health Risks Threaten the Self? Increasing the Acceptance of Threatening Health Messages Via Self-Affirmation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(9): 1046 - 1058.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. H. Eagly, P. Kulesa, L. A. Brannon, K. Shaw, and S. Hutson-Comeaux
Why Counterattitudinal Messages Are as Memorable as Proattitudinal Messages: The Importance of Active Defense Against Attack
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(11): 1392 - 1408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
B. Dietz-Uhler
Defensive Reactions to Group-Relevant Information
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 1999; 2(1): 17 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
L. G. Aspinwall
Introduction of Section: Persuasion for the Purpose of Cancer Risk Reduction: Understanding Responses to Risk Communications
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, January 1, 1999; 1999(25): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. R. Lundgren and R. Prislin
Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1998; 24(7): 715 - 726.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. A. Killeya and B. T. Johnson
Experimental Induction of Biased Systematic Processing: The Directed-Thought Technique
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1998; 24(1): 17 - 33.
[Abstract]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
T. M. Beasley and B. S. Kittel
Factors that Influence Health Risk Behaviors Among Tanning Salon Patrons
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1997; 20(4): 371 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
M. R. Somerfield
The Utility of Systems Models of Stress and Coping for Applied Research: The Case of Cancer Adaptation
J Health Psychol, April 1, 1997; 2(2): 133 - 151.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. G. Aspinwall and S. M. Brunhart
Distinguishing Optimism from Denial: Optimistic Beliefs Predict Attention to Health Threats
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1996; 22(10): 993 - 1003.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Biek, W. Wood, and S. Chaiken
Working Knowledge, Cognitive Processing, and Attitudes: On the Determinants of Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1996; 22(6): 547 - 556.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Liberman and S. Chaiken
The Direct Effect of Personal Relevance on Attitudes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1996; 22(3): 269 - 279.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. B. Gump and J. A. Klik
The Effect of a Model's HIV Status on Self-Perceptions: A Self-Protective Similarity Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1995; 21(8): 827 - 833.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
E. M. ALVARO and M. BURGOON
Individual Differences in Responses to Social Influence Attempts: Theory and Research on the Effects of Misanthropy
Communication Research, June 1, 1995; 22(3): 347 - 384.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. T. Johnson, H.-Y. Lin, C. S. Symons, L. A. Campbell, and G. Ekstein
Initial Beliefs and Attitudinal Latitudes as Factors in Persuasion
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1995; 21(5): 502 - 511.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. F. Baumeister and L. S. Newman
Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1994; 20(1): 3 - 19.
[Abstract]