Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Plog, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Plog, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 6, 730-735 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292186009
© 1992 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Trait Judgments about the Self: Evidence from the Encoding Specificity Paradigm

Stanley B. Klein

University of California, Santa Barbara

Judith Loftus

University of California, Santa Barbara

Amy E. Plog

University of Houston

How do people decide whether a trait is self-descriptive? According to the computational view, judging a trait for self-descriptiveness is accomplished by retrieving trait-relevant autobiographical episodes from memory and computing the similarity of the trait to the information retrieved. By contrast, the trait summary view argues that trait judgments are made by referring directly to abstract, summary knowledge of one's traits in memory. In previous work using a priming paradigm, the authors obtained support for the trait summary view. This article discusses a potential limitation of that paradigm and reports results from a new paradigm that is not subject to the same concerns. The findings converge with those of previous studies on the conclusion that trait self-descriptiveness judgments do not require the retrieval of trait-relevant autobiographical memories.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychology Developing SocietiesHome page
B. Singh
The Effects of Self Versus Others' Reference on Retention
Psychology Developing Societies, September 1, 1995; 7(2): 237 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. B. Klein and J. Loftus
Behavioral Experience and Trait Judgnents about the Self
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1993; 19(6): 740 - 745.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. B. Klein, J. Loftus, and J. W. Sherman
The Role of Summary and Specific Behavioral Memories in Trait Judgments about the Self
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1993; 19(3): 305 - 311.
[Abstract]