This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, T. D. Articles by LaFleur, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wilson, T. D. Articles by LaFleur, S. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction

University of Virginia

Douglas J. Lisle

University of Virginia

Jonathan W. Schooler

University of Pittsburgh

Sara D. Hodges

University of Virginia

Kristen J. Klaaren

University of Virginia

Suzanne J. LaFleur

University of Virginia

This study tested the prediction that introspecting about the reasons for one's preferences would reduce satisfaction with a consumer choice. Subjects evaluated two types of posters and then chose one to take home. Those instructed to think about their reasons chose a different type of poster than control subjects and, when contacted 3 weeks later, were less satisfied with their choice. When people think about reasons, they appear to focus on attributes of the stimulus that are easy to verbalize and seem like plausible reasons but may not be important causes of their initial evaluations. When these attributes imply a new evaluation of the stimulus, people change their attitudes and base their choices on these new attitudes. Over time, however, people's initial evaluation of the stimulus seems to return, and they come to regret choices based on the new attitudes.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. M. Holtgraves and Y. Kashima Language, Meaning, and Social Cognition Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 73 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. L. Nelson, P. K. J. Han, A. Fagerlin, M. Stefanek, and P. A. Ubel Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 609 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Dijksterhuis, M. W. Bos, L. F. Nordgren, and R. B. van Baaren On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, February 17, 2006; 311(5763): 1005 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Lieberman, J. M. Jarcho, and J. Obayashi Attributional Inference Across Cultures: Similar Automatic Attributions and Different Controlled Corrections Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2005; 31(7): 889 - 901. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Reber, N. Schwarz, and P. Winkielman Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2004; 8(4): 364 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Sainfort and B. C. Booske Measuring Post-decision Satisfaction Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 51 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Kmett, H. R. Arkes, and S. K. Jones The Influence of Decision Aids on High School Students' Satisfaction with their College Choice Decision Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1999; 25(10): 1293 - 1301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. D. Wilson and D. Kraft Why Do I Love Thee?: Effects of Repeated Introspections about a Dating Relationship on Attitudes toward the Relationship Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1993; 19(4): 409 - 418. [Abstract]