Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 4, 474-480 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167293194012
© 1993 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Physical Attractiveness Contrast Effect: Implications for Self-Esteem and Evaluations of the Social Self

Bill Thornton

University of Southern Maine

Scott Moore

University of Southern Maine

Three studies examined the impact of a physical attractiveness contrast effect on self-evaluations. Self-ratings of attractiveness by men and women exposed to highly attractive same-sex stimulus persons (negative contrast) were lower than those of peons not so exposed; attractiveness self-ratings were enhanced by exposure to unattractive stimulus persons (positive contrast). Global self-esteem was not influenced by a negative contrast effect; however, an adverse affect was observed on a more specific assessment of social self-esteem based on interpersonal competence. Corresponding increases in public self-consciousness occurred. 77e positive contrast effect was associated with marginally increased social self-esteem but not with heightened public self-consciousness. The potential role of public self-consciousness in mediating the attractiveness contrast effect is considered


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
D. A. Hargreaves and M. Tiggemann
'Body Image is for Girls': A Qualitative Study of Boys' Body Image.
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2006; 11(4): 567 - 576.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
J. Jung and S. J. Lennon
Body Image, Appearance Self-Schema, and Media Images
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, September 1, 2003; 32(1): 27 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. S. Mills, J. Polivy, C. P. Herman, and M. Tiggemann
Effects of Exposure to Thin Media Images: Evidence of Self-Enhancement among Restrained Eaters
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2002; 28(12): 1687 - 1699.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Henderson-King, E. Henderson-King, and L. Hoffmann
Media Images and Women's Self-Evaluations: Social Context and Importance of Attractiveness as Moderators
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2001; 27(11): 1407 - 1416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. C. Fejfar and R. H. Hoyle
Effect of Private Self-Awareness on Negative Affect and Self-Referent Attribution: A Quantitative Review
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2000; 4(2): 132 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. Dijkstra and B. P. Buunk
Jealousy as a Function of Rival Characteristics: An Evolutionary Perspective
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 1998; 24(11): 1158 - 1166.
[Abstract]