This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hilton, J. L. Articles by Miller, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hilton, J. L. Articles by Miller, D. T. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Suspicion and Dispositional Inference

University of Michigan

Steven Fein

Williams College

Dale T. Miller

Princeton University

The role of suspicion in the dispositional inference process is examined. Perceivers who are led to become suspicious of the motives underlying a target's behavior appear to engage in more active and thoughtful attributional analyses than nonsuspicious perceivers. Suspicious perceivers resist drawing inferences from a target's behavior that reflect the correspondence bias (or fundamental attribution error), and they consciously deliberate about questions of plausible causes and categorizations of the target's behavior They are, however, quite willing to make strong correspondent inferences about the target if they learn additional contextual information that renders alternative explanations for the target's behavior less plausible. Implications of these findings for current multiple-stage models of the dispositional inference process are discussed, and the need for these and other models to give more consideration to the social nature of social perception is asserted.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. F. Bond Jr. and B. M. DePaulo Accuracy of Deception Judgments Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2006; 10(3): 214 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S. Ellen, D. J. Webb, and L. A. Mohr Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2006; 34(2): 147 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Kramer Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 1998; 2(4): 251 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. McGRAW Manipulating Public Opinion with Moral Justification The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 1998; 560(1): 129 - 142. [Abstract]

				S. Fein, A. L. McCloskey, and T. M. Tomlinson Can the Jury Disregard that Information? The Use of Suspicion to Reduce the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity and Inadmissible Testimony Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 1997; 23(11): 1215 - 1226. [Abstract]

				M. G. MILLAR and K. U. MILLAR The Effects of Cognitive Capacity and Suspicion on Truth Bias Communication Research, October 1, 1997; 24(5): 556 - 570. [Abstract]

				C. G. Lord, K. O. Scott, M. A. Pugh, and D. M. Desforges Leakage Beliefs and the Correspondence Bias Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1997; 23(8): 824 - 836. [Abstract]

				M. D. ROBINSON, J. T. JOHNSON, and S. A. SHIELDS On the Advantages of Modesty: The Benefits of a Balanced Self-Presentation Communication Research, October 1, 1995; 22(5): 575 - 591. [Abstract]