Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baron, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Misovich, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baron, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Misovich, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 5, 541-552 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167293195006
© 1993 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Dispositional Knowing from an Ecological Perspective

Reuben M. Baron

University of Connecticut

Stephen J. Misovich

University of Connecticut

A direct perception analysis of dispositional knozwng, based on an ecological approach that is grounded in the use of activity to get mind into the world, is presented. It is proposed that social dispositions such as dominance or cooperativeness can be directly perceived, as opposed to inferred, if they are embodied in relational activities that activate the disposition. The choice of the particular activity as a way of turning dispositions into perceivable social affordances is related to an evolutionarily oriented analysis of dispositions as evolved adaptive solutions for solving basic social problems such as mate selection and group formation. Objections to the possibility of direct perception that are based on claims of insufficient or deceptive information are countered by the introduction of event-activity tests, modeled after perturbation and bifurcation processes in dynamic systems formulations. Comparisons are then made between the ecological claims of realism, mutualism, and activity and aspects of current constructive models of dispositional knowing, such as Wright and Mischel's conditional hedge model and Trope's Bayesian inference approach.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. A. Kenny
PERSON: A General Model of Interpersonal Perception
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2004; 8(3): 265 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
Y. F. Niemann, K. I. Pollak, S. Rogers, and E. O'Connor
Effects of Physical Context on Stereotyping of Mexican American Males
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 1998; 20(3): 349 - 362.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
H. H. Kelley
The "Stimulus Field" for Interpersonal Phenomena: The Source of Language and Thought About Interpersonal Events
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 1997; 1(2): 140 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. Fisher
Whose Right is it to Define the Self?
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 323 - 352.
[Abstract]