Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, E. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 5, 563-573 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167293195008
© 1993 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Expectancy Disconfirmation and Dispositional Inference: Latent Strength of Target-Based and Category-Based Expectancies

Carolyn Weisz

Princeton University

Edward E. Jones

Princeton University

To explore differences between target-based expectancies, those based on previous behavior, and category-based expectancies, those based on membership in a social category, two studies tested the hypothesis that target and category-based expectancies of equal predictive strength affect dispositional inference differently when disconfirming information is available. Subjects used either category or target-based information to form expectancies of a nonaggressive child and then listened to a tape of the child behaving aggressively. In Experiment 1, target-based expectancies influenced impressions more than category-based expectancies, and in both studies target-based subjects were less confident of their impressions than category-based subjects. Experiment 2 also found that perceivers with target-based expectancies were more like to attribute unexpected behavior to an unusual mood state than perceivers with category-based expectancies. Results suggest differences in the underlying structures of the two types of expectancies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Prislin, M. Brewer, and D. J. Wilson
Changing Majority and Minority Positions within a Group Versus an Aggregate
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2002; 28(5): 640 - 647.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
V. Y. Yzerbyt, A. Rogier, and S. T. Fiske
Group Entitativity and Social Attribution: On Translating Situational Constraints into Stereotypes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1998; 24(10): 1089 - 1103.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. L. Budesheim and K. Bonnelle
The Use of Abstract Trait Knowledge and Behavioral Exemplars in Causal Explanations of Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1998; 24(6): 575 - 587.
[Abstract]