Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gidron, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tversky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gidron, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tversky, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 5, 594-604 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167293195011
© 1993 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Implicit Quantification of Personality Traits

David Gidron

Hebrew University

Derek J. Koehler

Stanford University

Amos Tversky

Stanford University

The common usage of personality trait terms in the language includes an implicit quantification that is part of the accepted meaning of the term. This aspect of a trait's meaning is here called its scope. Traits with high scope, such as honest, require a high relative frequency of behavioral manifestation before they are attributed. In contrast, low-scope traits such as dishonest can be attributed on the basis of very few behavioral instances. A number of hypotheses are considered concerning the scope of trait terms within a language and between languages. Speakers of a given language (English or Hebrew) exhibit agreement in their ratings of scope; English and Hebrew speakers also agree with each other on the scope of trait terms even when they disagree about the behavioral manifestations of those traits. These findings are interpreted in terms of an informational view of personality traits: The scope of a trait is set at a level that makes it communicatively useful.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Trafimow, I. K. Bromgard, K. A. Finlay, and T. Ketelaar
The Role of Affect in Determining the Attributional Weight of Immoral Behaviors
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2005; 31(7): 935 - 948.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Biernat and J. E. Ma
Stereotypes and the Confirmability of Trait Concepts
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2005; 31(4): 483 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Trafimow and S. Trafimow
Mapping Perfect and Imperfect Duties onto Hierarchically and Partially Restrictive Trait Dimensions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1999; 25(6): 687 - 697.
[Abstract] [PDF]