This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hendrick, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hendrick, C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Social Psychology as History and as Traditional Science: An Appraisal

Kent State University

Gergen (1973) presented the thesis that social psychology is primarily an historical inquiry. The implications of his paper are very significant for the status of social psychology as a scien tific discipline. In defense of traditional science Schlenker (1974) presented a strong rebuttal, focussing on five major issues; the nature of theoretical abstractness, the search for regularity, open systems, the conditional nature of scientific propositions, and the uniqueness of events. The present paper considers the Gergen- Schlenker debate within the context of these five issues. The analyses indicate that Schlenker's rebuttal arguments are not de finitive, and that Gergen's thesis still awaits a decisive answer.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Manis Is Social Psychology Really Different? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1976; 2(4): 428 - 437. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Brewster Smith Social Psychology, Science, and History: So What? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1976; 2(4): 438 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]