Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lightdale, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lightdale, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rethinking Sex Differences in Aggression: Aggressive Behavior in the Absence of Social Roles

Jenifer R. Lightdale

Princeton University

Deborah A. Prentice

Princeton University

Two studies investigated the influence of social roles on sex differences in aggression, the first focusing on expectations and the second on behavior In both studies, deindividuation was used to remove the influence of social roles. In Study 1, implicit theories about sex differences in aggression were examined by asking people to predict aggression by males and females in individuated and deindividuated conditions. People expected men to be more aggressive than women but did not show an appreciation of the disinhibiting effects of deindividuation. In Study 2, deindividuation was manipulated in the laboratory to assess its effects in an aggression-eliciting situation. As predicted, men aggressed more than women in the individuated condition, but this difference was eliminated in the deindividuated condition. Subjects' perceptions of their behavior were more consistent with the implicit theories documented in Study I than with how they actually behaved.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 1, 34-44 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294201003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
T. A. KANE, P. K. STAIGER, and L. A. RICCIARDELLI
Male Domestic Violence: Attitudes, Aggression, and Interpersonal Dependency
J Interpers Violence, January 1, 2000; 15(1): 16 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
D. K. Forgays, C. D. Spielberger, S. A. Ottaway, and D. G. Forgays
Factor Structure of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory for Middle-Aged Men and Women
Assessment, June 1, 1998; 5(2): 141 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]