Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanna, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pusecker, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sanna, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pusecker, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-Efficacy, Valence of Self-Evaluation, and Performance

Lawrence J. Sanna

Bucknell University

Paul A. Pusecker

United States Military Academy

In two experiments, self efficacy theory was used to conceptualize the effect of efficacy expectancies and valence of self-evaluation on performance. In Experiment 1, efficacy expectancies were manipulated by practice item difficulty and feedback, and self-evaluation was manipulated by providing a standard of comparison. In Experiment 2, efficacy expectancies developed spontaneously while participants performed easy or difficult tasks, and the potential for self-evaluation was crossed with the potential for experimenter evaluation. In both experiments, as predicted, in the high-efficacy condition, self-evaluation participants performed better than no-self-evaluation participants, whereas in the low-efficacy condition, self-evaluation participants performed worse than no-self-evaluation participants. In addition, in Experiment 2, the equivalence of self-evaluation and experimenter evaluation was demonstrated. Implications for self-effcacy and self evaluation processes are discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 1, 82-92 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294201008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
S. Reich, L. Bickman, and C. A. Heflinger
Covariates of Self-Efficacy: Caregiver Characteristics Related to Mental Health Services Self-Efficacy
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2004; 12(2): 99 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. A. Shepperd and K. M. Taylor
Social Loafing and Expectancy-Value Theory
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1999; 25(9): 1147 - 1158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna
Self-Efficacy and Counterfactual Thinking: Up a Creek with and without a Paddle
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1997; 23(6): 654 - 666.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna, K. J. Turley, and M. M. Mark
Expected Evaluation, Goals, and Performance Mood as Input
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1996; 22(4): 323 - 335.
[Abstract]