Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McHoskey, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McHoskey, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 3, 266-276 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294203004

Effects of Constraint Identification, Processing Mode, Expectancies, and Intragroup Variability on Attributions toward Group Members

John W. McHoskey

Miami University, JMCHOSK{at}CLEMSON

Arthur G. Miller

Miami University

Several hypotheses were investigated in relation to the group correspondence bias (GCB), an observer tendency to make correspondent attributions based on a contextually constrained group decision. It was predicted that processing mode (i.e., heuristic vs. systematic) would moderate observers' identification of constraint information and that the identification of constraint would, in turn, mediate the GCB. In addition, participants were provided with an expectancy about the target group, and it was expected that this information would place boundary conditions on the GCB. These predictions received strong support. The results also indicate that intragroup variability moderates the impact of expectancies on the GCB. More-over, observers generalized their attributions based on a constrained group decision, indicating that the GCB may have a widespread impact on the perceived character of individual group members.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Johnson, C. Simmons, S. Trawalter, T. Ferguson, and W. Reed
Variation in Black Anti-White Bias and Target Distancing Cues: Factors that Influence Perceptions of "Ambiguously Racist" Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2003; 29(5): 609 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]