Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keating, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Heltman, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keating, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Heltman, K. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dominance and Deception in Children and Adults: Are Leaders the Best Misleaders?

Caroline F. Keating

Colgate University

Karen R. Heltman

Colgate University

Relationships between dominance and nonverbal deception skill were investigated in preschool children (Study 1) and in under-graduate men and women (Study 2). Subjects were assessed for dominance during peer group interactions. Later, they encoded and decoded deceptive messages. Raters assessed the credibility of each subject's encoded message using nonverbal cues alone. Ability to encode credible, deceptive messages predicted dominance in preschool children and men but not women. Decoding deception accurately from nonverbal cues was unrelated to dominance. Videotapes of subjects' performances were examined for nonverbal behaviors predictive of deception success. Very young children successfully masked their deception by smiling. Successful adult deceivers made eye contact with the listener and inhibited smiling while delivering deceptive messages. Overall, results were generally consistent with a social skills approach to dominance in which manipulative ability is believed to be integral to achieving and maintaining social power.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 3, 312-321 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294203009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. A. Forrest and R. S. Feldman
Detecting Deception and Judge's Involvement: Lower Task Involvement Leads to Better Lie Detection
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2000; 26(1): 118 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. J. Coats and R. S. Feldman
Gender Differences in Nonverbal Correlates of Social Status
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1996; 22(10): 1014 - 1022.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
C. Bechler and S. D. Johnson
Leadership and Listening: A Study of Member Perceptions
Small Group Research, February 1, 1995; 26(1): 77 - 85.
[Abstract]