Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pegalis, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Greenier, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pegalis, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Greenier, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 4, 412-420 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294204008
© 1994 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

On the Ability to Elicit Self-Disclosure: Are there Gender-Based and Contextual Limitations on the Opener Effect?

Linda J. Pegalis

University of Georgia

David R. Shaffer

University of Georgia

Doris G. Bazzini

University of Georgia

Keegan Greenier

University of Georgia

Previous work with Miller; Berg, and Archer's Opener Scale has shown that females who score high on the opener dimension are more proficient than those who score low at eliciting self-disclosure from conversational partners. The present study tests the generality of this "opener effect" to males and across different context. It was expected that the opener effect would be most apparent in contexts where people are normally reluctant to self-disclose (i.e., when instrumental motives are salient for females and when social/expressive motives are salient for males). However, high opener interviewers of each sex elicited longer and more intimate self-disclosures than low-opener interviewers, and this opener effect was not moderated by situational context. Further analyses of interviewer behaviors suggested that high openers were the more successful at eliciting self-disclosure because they were more inclined to seek information through verbal prompts that encourage intimate revelations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
T. C. Marshall
Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism--collectivism
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 143 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. A. Yovetich and S. M. Drigotas
Secret Transmission: A Relative Intimacy Hypothesis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1999; 25(9): 1135 - 1146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. R. Shaffer, L. J. Pegalis, and D. G. Bazzimi
When Boy Meets Girl (Revisited): Gender, Gender-Role Orientation, and Prospect of Future Interaction as Determinants of Seff-Disclosure among Same- and Opposite-Sex Acquaintances
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1996; 22(5): 495 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]