Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ptacek, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dodge, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ptacek, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dodge, K. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 4, 421-430 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294204009

Gender Differences in Coping with Stress: When Stressor and Appraisals Do Not Differ

J. T. Ptacek

University of Washington

Ronald E. Smith

University of Washington

Kenneth L. Dodge

Iowa State University

In an attempt to control for the effects of event type on sex differences in coping, men and women responded to an identical achievement-related stressor under controlled laboratory conditions. Although men and women were similar in their cognitive appraisal of the situation, they nonetheless reported differences in preparatory coping. Women reported seeking social support and using emotion-focused coping to a greater extent than men, whereas men reported using relatively more problem-focused coping than women. The masculinity and femininity of respondents failed to moderate the relation between sex and coping. These results are inconsistent with a purely situational explanation of sex differences in coping but are consistent with the notion that men and women are socialized to cope with stress in different ways.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
T. M. Greer
Measuring Coping Strategies Among African Americans: An Exploration of the Latent Structure of the COPE Inventory
Journal of Black Psychology, August 1, 2007; 33(3): 260 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
J. B. Hittner
Factorial Invariance of the 13-item Sense of Coherence Scale across Gender
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2007; 12(2): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Active Learning in Higher EducationHome page
J. Lawrence, K. Ashford, and P. Dent
Gender differences in coping strategies of undergraduate students and their impact on self-esteem and attainment
Active Learning in Higher Education, November 1, 2006; 7(3): 273 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AutismHome page
R. P. Hastings, H. Kovshoff, T. Brown, N. J. Ward, F. D. Espinosa, and B. Remington
Coping strategies in mothers and fathers of preschool and school-age children with autism
Autism, October 1, 2005; 9(4): 377 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
M. Lindorff
Determinants of received social support: Who gives what to managers?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2005; 22(3): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
L. K. Tamres, D. Janicki, and V. S. Helgeson
Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2002; 6(1): 2 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Hollnagel, K. Malterud, and K. Witt
Men's self-assessed personal health resources: approaching patients' strong points in general practice
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2000; 17(6): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]