Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bersoff, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bersoff, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 5, 592-602 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167294205015

Cultural Influences on the Moral Status of Reciprocity and the Discounting of Endogenous Motivation

Joan G. Miller

Yale University

David M. Bersoff

University of Pennsylvania

Americans and Hindu Indians evaluated hypothetical situations in which helping was performed in response to prior reciprocity, in response to a monetary payment, or spontaneously. Reciprocity considerations increase the number of Indians viewing helping in moral terms but had no effect on moral judgment among Americans. Americans judged that helping is less endogenously motivated when undertaken in response to the norm of reciprocity than when spontaneous, whereas Indians viewed helping as equally endogenously motivated in those two cases. Results imply that interpersonal reciprocity is invested with a deontological moral status rather than viewed in purely utilitarian terms in cultures emphasizing interdependent, as contrasted with independent, views of the self: The findings also suggest that less of a dichotomy is drawn between communal and exchange relationships and between endogenous motivation and normative conformity in the former type of culture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
A. B. Cohen, D. E. Hall, H. G. Koenig, and K. G. Meador
Social Versus Individual Motivation: Implications for Normative Definitions of Religious Orientation
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 48 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
H. Shimizu
Japanese Adolescent Boys' Senses of Empathy (Omoiyari) and Carol Gilligan's Perspectives on the Morality of Care: A Phenomenological Approach
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2001; 7(4): 453 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
K. Vasquez, D. Keltner, D. H. Ebenbach, and T. L. Banaszynski
Cultural Variation and Similarity in Moral Rhetorics: Voices from the Philippines and the United States
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 93 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. Baron and J. G. Miller
Limiting the Scope of Moral Obligations to Help: A Cross-Cultural Investigation
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, November 1, 2000; 31(6): 703 - 725.
[Abstract] [PDF]