Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhodewalt, F.
Right arrow Articles by Waller, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rhodewalt, F.
Right arrow Articles by Waller, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 10, 1042-1050 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672952110005
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Seff-Handicapping and Interpersonal Trade-Offs: The Effects of Claimed Self-Handicaps on Observers' Performance Evaluations and Feedback

Frederick Rhodewalt

University of Utah

David M. Sanbonmatsu

University of Utah

Brian Tschanz

University of Utah

David L. Feick

University of Utah

Ann Waller

University of Utah

Male subjects evaluated the performance of targets who, prior to and during the performance, offered no excuse, claimed intended low effort, claimed anxiety, or claimed drug impairment. Cross-cutting the excuse manipulation was the publicity of the feedback; half the subjects believed their evaluations were private, and half believed they would have to communicate their evaluations to the target. Subjects evaluated objectively equivalent performances more negatively if they came from an excuse-making target than a no-excuse target. Subjects provided less favorable feedback to targets claiming low effort or drug impairment than to those citing anxiety or no excuse. Depending on the handicap claimed, observers either discounted ability (claimed low effort) or inferred lower ability from perceived poorer performance (claimed anxiety or claimed drug impairment). Implications for the interpersonal consequences of self-handicapping and the self-perpetuating nature of such strategies are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. D. Rucker and R. E. Petty
Effects of Accusations on the Accuser: The Moderating Role of Accuser Culpability
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1259 - 1271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. R. Schlenker, B. A. Pontari, and A. N. Christopher
Excuses and Character: Personal and Social Implications of Excuses
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2001; 5(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]