Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 10, 1051-1060 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672952110006
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Speed of Speech and Persuasion: Evidence for Multiple Effects

Stephen M. Smith

North Georgia College

David R. Shaffer

University of Georgia

This study examined the possibility that increased speech rate can affect persuasion either by acting as an agreement cue or through its impact on message processing. Participants heard messages that were either moderate or high in personal relevance, consisted of weak or strong arguments, and were presented at either moderate (180 words per minute) or fast (220 wpm) rates of speech. Consistent with hypotheses derived from the elaboration likelihood model, fast speech served to inhibit participants' tendency to differentially agree with strong versus weak message arguments under both moderate and high relevance. However; fast speech was associated with increased persuasion only for moderate involvement subjects, and this influence was mediated by perceptions of source credibility. Polarity of message-based elaborations predicted attitudes of both moderately and highly involved subjects. Thus, central and peripheral route processes appeared to be co-occurring for moderately involved participants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
W. van der Vaart, Y. Ongena, A. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra
Do Interviewers' Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2006; 18(4): 488 - 499.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. L. Marsh, D. M. Hart-O'Rourke, and D. L. Julka
The Persuasive Effects of Verbal and Nonverbal Information in a Context of Value Relevance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1997; 23(6): 563 - 579.
[Abstract]