Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pacini, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pacini, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Linda Problem Revisited from the Perspective of Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory

Seymour Epstein

University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Veronika Denes-Raj

University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Rosemary Pacini

University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Results from four experiments (N = 548) support the hypothesis from cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST) that the resistance of the notorious Linda conjunction problem to solution can be attributed primarily to its simultaneously concrete and unnatural context. The experiments demonstrated that the influence of other variables, such as problem order, event likelihood, within-versus between-protagonist context, and statistical sophistication, although important, cannot account for the robust influence of the combination of the concrete-abstract and natural-unnatural dimensions. The implications of the demonstration that virtually everyone has intuitive knowledge of the conjunction rule are discussed, in addition to cuing effects, narrative processing, and methodological issues that have produced serious distortions in the interpretation of previous research.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 11, 1124-1138 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672952111001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
M. Lindeman, P. Keskivaara, and M. Roschier
Assessment of Magical Beliefs about Food and Health
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2000; 5(2): 195 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Epstein, S. Donovan, and V. Denes-Raj
The Missing Link in the Paradox of the Linda Conjunction Problem: Beyond Knowing and Thinking of the Conjunction Rule, the Intrinsic Appeal of Heuristic Processing
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1999; 25(2): 204 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]