This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dunning, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dunning, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Trait Importance and Modifiability as Factors Influencing Self-Assessment and Self-Enhancement Motives

Cornell University

People's search for information about the self is governed by motives of self-enhancement (seeking feedback to the extent that it will be favorable) and self-assessment (seeking accurate feed-back regardless of its favorability). Which motive predominates as an ability under consideration becomes more important? An experiment suggested that both motives are evoked, depending on whether people believe the ability reflects a stable or malleable aspect of personality. When an ability was described as stable, subjects displayed a self-enhancing pattern, showing greater enthusiasm for feedback after success than after failure on an initial test for the trait, but only when the ability was deemed important. In contrast, when the ability was described as malleable, subjects followed a self-assessment pattern, being more solicitous of feedback when the trait was described as important as opposed to inconsequential, regardless of initial success or failure.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 12, 1297-1306 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672952112007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. El-Alayli and S. Gabriel To Prove or to Improve? Which Motive Distorts Perceptions of Personality Controllability? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2007; 33(11): 1572 - 1586. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Heine and T. Hamamura In Search of East Asian Self-Enhancement Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2007; 11(1): 4 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Campbell, S. D. Lackenbauer, and A. Muise When Is Being Known or Adored by Romantic Partners Most Beneficial? Self-Perceptions, Relationship Length, and Responses to Partner's Verifying and Enhancing Appraisals Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 1283 - 1294. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Haslam, B. Bastian, and M. Bissett Essentialist Beliefs about Personality and Their Implications Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2004; 30(12): 1661 - 1673. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Silvia and A. G. Phillips Self-Awareness, Self-Evaluation, and Creativity Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2004; 30(8): 1009 - 1017. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Renner Biased Reasoning: Adaptive Responses to Health Risk Feedback Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 384 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Greve and D. Wentura Immunizing the Self: Self-Concept Stabilization Through Reality-Adaptive Self-Definitions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2003; 29(1): 39 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Heine and K. Renshaw Interjudge Agreement, Self-Enhancement, and Liking: Cross-Cultural Divergences Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2002; 28(5): 578 - 587. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. B. Arnkelsson and W. P. Smith The Impact of Stable and Unstable Attributes on Ability Assessment in Social Comparison Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2000; 26(8): 936 - 947. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Sedikides and M. J. Strube The Multiply Motivated Self Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1995; 21(12): 1330 - 1335. [Abstract]