This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Swann, W. B. Articles by Schroeder, D. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Swann, W. B., Jr. Articles by Schroeder, D. G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Search for Beauty and Truth: A Framework for Understanding Reactions to Evaluations

University of Texas at Austin, swann{at}psy.utexs.edu

Daniel G. Schroeder

University of Texas at Austin

It is proposed that independent desires for positivity and verisimilitude shape the sequence of cognitive operations people perform on self-relevant evaluations. In phase 1, the mere identification of evaluative information triggers a minimally cognitive tendency to embrace favorable evaluations and eschew unfavorable ones, a positive tropism. If sufficient motivation and cognitive resources are available, people proceed to phase 2, wherein they evaluate the verisimilitude of the evaluation by comparing it with a series of representations of self; beginning with their actual selves. To the extent that actual selves are uncertain and cognitive resources and motivation to continue processing are ample, people make additional comparisons with various possible selves (e.g., who they ought to be, who they ideally might be, and who they are according to "objectively accurate" indexes). If sufficient cognitive resources and motivation are still available, people will engage in a third phase, consisting of a cost-benefit analysis.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 12, 1307-1318 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672952112008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Chen, T. English, and K. Peng Self-Verification and Contextualized Self-Views Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2006; 32(7): 930 - 942. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. B. Sanitioso and R. Wlodarski In Search of Information That Confirms a Desired Self-Perception: Motivated Processing of Social Feedback and Choice of Social Interactions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2004; 30(4): 412 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Renner Biased Reasoning: Adaptive Responses to Health Risk Feedback Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 384 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. B. Swann Jr., J. K. Bosson, and B. W. Pelham Different Partners, Different Selves: Strategic Verification of Circumscribed Identities Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2002; 28(9): 1215 - 1228. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Rudich and R. R. Vallacher To belong or to Self-Enhance? Motivational Bases for Choosing Interaction Partners Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 1999; 25(11): 1387 - 1404. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Katz, P. Anderson, and S. R.H. Beach Dating Relationship Quality: Effects of Global Self-Verification and Self-Enhancement Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 1997; 14(6): 829 - 842. [Abstract]

				C. Sedikides and M. J. Strube The Multiply Motivated Self Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1995; 21(12): 1330 - 1335. [Abstract]