This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilovich, T. Articles by Chen, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gilovich, T. Articles by Chen, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Commission, Omission, and Dissonance Reduction: Coping with Regret in the "Monty Hall" Problem

Cornell University

Victoria Husted Medvec

Cornell University

Serena Chen

New York University

Do people reduce dissonance more for their errors of commission than their errors of omission? More specifically, do people come to value a disappointing outcome obtained through a direct action more than an identical outcome obtained through a failure to act? To answer this question, the authors created a laboratory analogue of the "three doors" or "Monty Hall" problem. Subjects initially selected one box from a group of three, only one of which contained a "grand" prize. After the experimenter opened one of the two unchosen boxes and revealed a modest prize, subjects were asked to decide whether to stay with their initial selection or trade it in for the other unopened box. Regardless of the subject's choice, a modest prize was received. Results indicated that subjects who switched boxes assigned a higher monetary value to the modest prize they received than those who stayed with their initial choice. Implications for the psychology of regret are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Epstude and N. J. Roese The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 168 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chen, C.-Y. Chiu, N. J. Roese, K.-P. Tam, and I. Y.-M. Lau Culture and Counterfactuals: On the Importance of Life Domains Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 75 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. J. Roese and A. Summerville What We Regret Most... and Why Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2005; 31(9): 1273 - 1285. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Gilovich, R. F. Wang, D. Regan, and S. Nishina Regrets Of Action And Inaction Across Cultures Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 61 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. Monroe Paradigm Shift: From Rational Choice to Perspective International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, April 1, 2001; 22(2): 151 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Zeelenberg, J. van der Pligt, and A. S. R. Manstead Undoing Regret on Dutch Television: Apologizing for Interpersonal Regrets Involving Actions or Inactions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1998; 24(10): 1113 - 1119. [Abstract]

				S. J. Heine and D. R. Lehman Culture, Dissonance, and Self-Affirmation Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1997; 23(4): 389 - 400. [Abstract]

				K. Savitsky, V. H. Medvec, and T. Gilovich Remembering and Regretting: The Zeigarnik Effect and the Cognitive Availability of Regrettable Actions and Inactions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1997; 23(3): 248 - 257. [Abstract]

				L. J. Sanna and K. J. Turley Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1996; 22(9): 906 - 919. [Abstract]