Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaFrance, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LaFrance, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 3, 207-214 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295213002
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Why Smiles Generate Leniency

Marianne LaFrance

Boston College

Marvin A. Hecht

Boston College

The authors investigated the social significance of human smiles, specifically the penchant for transgressors who smile to be judged more leniently than those who do not. Of particular interest was whether different types of smiles generate different degrees of leniency and what mediated the effect. Subjects judged a case of possible academic misconduct. Materials included a photograph of a female target displaying a neutral expression, felt smile, false smile, or miserable smile. Smiling targets received more leniency than nonsmiling targets, although they were not seen as less guilty. The type of smile did not significantly moderate the amount of leniency shown. Of the variables evaluated for mediating the smile-leniency effect, such as perceiving the target as more likable, submissive, or diplomatic, the one that best accounted for the effect was perceiving the target as a trustworthy person. The implication seems to be—if in trouble, smile.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. A. Hecht and M. LaFrance
License or Obligation to Smile: The Effect of Power and Sex on Amount and Type of Smiling
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1998; 24(12): 1332 - 1342.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. Glaser and P. Salovey
Affect in Electoral Politics
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 1998; 2(3): 156 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]