This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fiedler, K. Articles by Berkel, I. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Fiedler, K. Articles by Berkel, I. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Actor-Observer Bias in Close Relationships: The Role of Self-Knowledge and Self-Related Language

University of Heidelberg

Guin R. Semin

Free University of Amsterdam

Catrin Finkenauer

Catholic University Louvain-la-Neuve

Ingnd Berkel

University of Mannheim

Attributional biases are studied in the context of close relation ships. Whereas the actor-observer bias implies more partner attributions than self-attributions, the egocentric bias predicts more self-attributions. Both phenomena can be reconciled within a language-based approach. Partner attributions prevail at the abstract level of adjectives, whereas self-attributions are more likely at the concrete level of action verbs, reflecting a rule to talk in less abstract terms about the self than about others. An alternative explanation based on multifaceted self-knowledge is refuted in Experiment 1. Experiment 2 replicates and extends the opposite attribution biases at different language levels, using free-format self- and partner descriptions. A comparison between short-term and long-term couples reveals a temporal decline in dispositional attributions. These findings support the role of language in addition to self-knowledge and perceptual determinants of attribution biases.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Watson and C. Gallois Patients' Interactions with Health Providers: A Linguistic Category Model Approach Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2002; 21(1): 32 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Schmid and K. Fiedler A Parsimonious Theory Can Account for Complex Phenomena: A Discursive Analysis of Edwards and Potter's Critique of Non-Discursive Language Research Theory Psychology, December 1, 1999; 9(6): 807 - 822. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. de Poot and G. R. Semin Pick Your Verbs with Care When You Formulate a Question! Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 1995; 14(4): 351 - 368. [Abstract]