Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cota, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Longman, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cota, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Longman, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 6, 572-580 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295216003
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Structure of Group Cohesion

Albert A. Cota

Joyceville Institution

Charles R. Evans

University of Guelph

Kenneth L. Dion

University of Toronto

Lindy Kilik

Queen's University

R. Stewart Longman

Swift Current Mental Health Clinic

Group cohesion is an important construct in understanding the behavior of groups. However, there has been ongoing controversy on how to define and measure this construct. Central to this debate is the structure of cohesion. The authors critically review the literature on unidimensional and multidimensional models of cohesion and describe cohesion as a multidimensional construct with primary and secondary dimensions. Primary dimensions are applicable to describing the cohesiveness of all or most types of groups, whereas secondary dimensions are applicable to describing the cohesiveness of specific types of groups. Viewing group cohesion as consisting of primary and secondary dimensions is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
J. Griffith
Further Considerations Concerning the Cohesion-Performance Relation in Military Settings
Armed Forces & Society, October 1, 2007; 34(1): 138 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Kray, L. Thompson, and E. A. Lind
It's a Bet! A Problem-Solving Approach Promotes the Construction of Contingent Agreements
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 1039 - 1051.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
P. A. Chansler, P. M. Swamidass, and C. Cammann
Self-Managing Work Teams: An Empirical Study of Group Cohesiveness in "Natural Work Groups" at a Harley-Davidson Motor Company Plant
Small Group Research, February 1, 2003; 34(1): 101 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
C. R. Emery and L. D. Fredendall
The Effect of Teams on Firm Profitability and Customer Satisfaction
Journal of Service Research, February 1, 2002; 4(3): 217 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. Chang and P. Bordia
A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship
Small Group Research, August 1, 2001; 32(4): 379 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. V. Carron and L. R. Brawley
Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues
Small Group Research, February 1, 2000; 31(1): 89 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
K. B. Henry, H. Arrow, and B. Carini
A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement
Small Group Research, October 1, 1999; 30(5): 558 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]