This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Priester, J. R. Articles by Petty, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Priester, J. R. Articles by Petty, R. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny

Fordham University

Richard E. Petty

Ohio State University

A hypothesis derived from current two-route models of persuasion was examined-that a communicator's perceived honesty is a determinant of the extent to which attitude change is based on scrutiny of the substance of the persuasive message. Specifically, cognitive misers are expected to forgo effortful message scrutiny when a communicator can be assumed to be truthful. In a preliminary study, honesty was found to be the source characteristic most highly associated with providing an accurate message. Then, in three experiments, source honesty was manipulated either directly (by presenting information about past honesty of the source) or indirectly (using an expectancy confirmation! disconfirmation procedure). In all three studies, post message attitudes of individuals low in the need for cognition (NC) cognitive misers-were less dependent on message scrutiny when the source was assumed to be relatively honest. For high-NC individuals, message scrutiny did not differ depending on the source.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 6, 637-654 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295216010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. van Beuningen, K. de Ruyter, M. Wetzels, and S. Streukens Customer Self-Efficacy in Technology-Based Self-Service: Assessing Between- and Within-Person Differences Journal of Service Research, May 1, 2009; 11(4): 407 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. L. Tormala and V. L. DeSensi The Effects of Minority/Majority Source Status on Attitude Certainty: A Matching Perspective Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2009; 35(1): 114 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Petty, K. G. DeMarree, P. Brinol, J. Horcajo, and A. J. Strathman Need for Cognition Can Magnify or Attenuate Priming Effects in Social Judgment Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 900 - 912. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Petty and P. Brinol Psychological Processes Underlying Persuasion: A Social Psychological Approach Diogenes, February 1, 2008; 55(1): 52 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Sargent Less Thought, More Punishment: Need for Cognition Predicts Support for Punitive Responses to Crime Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2004; 30(11): 1485 - 1493. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ziegler, M. Diehl, R. Zigon, and T. Fett Source Consistency, Distinctiveness, and Consensus: The Three Dimensions of the Kelley ANOVA Model in Persuasion Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 352 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Evans and R. E. Petty Self-Guide Framing and Persuasion: Responsibly Increasing Message Processing to Ideal Levels Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2003; 29(3): 313 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Hosman, T. M. Huebner, and S. A. Siltanen The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2002; 21(4): 361 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-P. Erb, G. Bohner, S. Rank, and S. Einwiller Processing Minority and Majority Communications: The Role of Conflict with Prior Attitudes Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2002; 28(9): 1172 - 1182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ziegler, M. Diehl, and A. Ruther Multiple Source Characteristics and Persuasion: Source Inconsistency as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2002; 28(4): 496 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Stern, J. W. Mullennix, C.-l. Dyson, and S. J. Wilson The Persuasiveness of Synthetic Speech versus Human Speech Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, December 1, 1999; 41(4): 588 - 595. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. J. Frewer, C. Howard, D. Hedderley, and R. Shepherd Reactions to information about genetic engineering: impact of source characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasiveness Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 1999; 8(1): 35 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Petty and D. T. Wegener Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications for Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1998; 24(3): 227 - 240. [Abstract]

				K. L. Marsh, D. M. Hart-O'Rourke, and D. L. Julka The Persuasive Effects of Verbal and Nonverbal Information in a Context of Value Relevance Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1997; 23(6): 563 - 579. [Abstract]

				S. M. Smith and R. E. Petty Message Framing and Persuasion: A Message Processing Analysis Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1996; 22(3): 257 - 268. [Abstract]