Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, L.
Right arrow Articles by Coolen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, L.
Right arrow Articles by Coolen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 7, 660-673 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295217001
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

A Dual Processing Approach to Stereotype Change

Lucy Johnston

University of Canterbury, psyc380{at}psyc.canterbury.ac.nz

Petra Coolen

University of Nijmegen

The reported research considered the applicability of a dual process framework to stereotype change. Three experiments manipulated task involvement, source credibility, and message quality and measured stereotype change. Under conditions of high involvement, stereotype change was effected only by message cues. In low-involvement conditions, there was an additive effect of source and message cues. This credibility effect was due to an enhancement of the impact of stereotype-disconfirming information when presented by a highly credible source. These findings show differential processing of stereotype-disconfirming information under hig4 and low involvement, consistent with the dual process approach. Processing time, recall, and thought listing also showed differential processing of the counter stereotypical message under high-and low-involvement conditions. Results are discussed in terms of the models of persuasion, and implications for traditional stereotype change research are considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?