Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berkowitz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Devine, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berkowitz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Devine, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 7, 696-703 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295217004
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Has Social Psychology Always Been Cognitive? What is "Cognitive" Anyhow?

Leonard Berkowitz

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Patricia G. Devine

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Contrary to the claim that social psychology has always been cognitive, important early researchers actually had an associationistic perspective. Today's cognitivism is more similar to contemporary associationism than is often supposed because it no longer maintains the necessity of an active mental transformation of sensory input and recognizes automatic, passive processing. However, many social cognitivists still prefer analyses assuming mental activity, and the authors note how this preference influences current social psychological research. Social psychology can benefit from the recognition of the commonalities between social cognition and the theoretical perspective held ty earlier investigators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. N. Shelton
A Reconceptualization of How We Study Issues of Racial Prejudice
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 374 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. C. Sherman, A. M. Buddie, K. L. Dragan, C. M. End, and L. J. Finney
Twenty Years of PSPB: Trends in Content, Design, and Analysis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1999; 25(2): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. T. Jost, A. W. Kruglanski, and T. O. Nelson
Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 1998; 2(2): 137 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]