Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melton, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Melton, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 8, 788-794 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218001
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Role of Positive Affect in Syllogism Performance

R. Jeffrey Melton

Indiana University

Previous research has found that people in positive moods perform better than others on creativity and divergent thinking tasks but perform more poorly and/or process the available information less thoroughly on many other cognitive tasks. The present experiment examined various hypotheses concerning the process mediating the latter effect. Positive mood subjects performed significantly worse on a set of syllogisms than control subjects, even though they had ample timefor the task. Positive mood subjects were also significantly more likely than controls to select an unqualified conclusion, tended to take less time on the task, tended to diagram the relationships depicted by the premises less frequently, and tended to give more answers consistent with the atmosphere heuristic. Together; these findings argue against distraction accounts of the influence of positive affect. The results are most consistent with accounts arguing that people in positive moods expend less effort.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
J. K. Boehm and S. Lyubomirsky
Does Happiness Promote Career Success?
Journal of Career Assessment, February 1, 2008; 16(1): 101 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. J. Stroessner, D. M. Mackie, and V. Michalsen
Positive Mood and the Perception of Variability Within and Between Groups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2005; 8(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. L. Gohm and G. L. Clore
Individual Differences in Emotional Experience: Mapping Available Scales to Processes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2000; 26(6): 679 - 697.
[Abstract] [PDF]