Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latané, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Latané, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 8, 795-805 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218002
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact

Bibb Latané

Florida Atlantic University, latane{at}socpsy.scifau.edu

James H. Liu

Florida Atlantic University

Andrzej Nowak

Florida Atlantic University

Michael Bonevento

Florida Atlantic University

Long Zheng

Florida Atlantic University

Studies of college students and citizens of south Florida, United States, students in Shanghai, China, and an international sample of social psychologists show that social influence, measured by the frequency of memorable interactions, is heavily determined by distance. In all three cases, although there was a great deal of interaction with distant persons, the relationship between distance and interaction frequency was well described by an inverse power function with a slope of approximately -1, consistent with the expectation that social impact is proportional to the inverse square of the distance separating two persons. This result confirms one principle from Latane's 1981 theory of social impact and helps explain the ability of opinion minorities to cluster and survive in the face of majority influence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Cullum and H. C. Harton
Cultural Evolution: Interpersonal Influence, Issue Importance, and the Development of Shared Attitudes in College Residence Halls
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2007; 33(10): 1327 - 1339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
E. Elron and E. Vigoda-Gadot
Influence and Political Processes in Cyberspace: The Case of Global Virtual Teams
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 295 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
W. Kalkhoff and S. R. Thye
Expectation States Theory and Research: New Observations From Meta-Analysis
Sociological Methods Research, November 1, 2006; 35(2): 219 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. K. Ahuja and J. E. Galvin
Socialization in Virtual Groups
Journal of Management, April 1, 2003; 29(2): 161 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
J. K. Parrish, S. V. Viscido, and D. Grunbaum
Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 296 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. S. Knowles
Distance Matters more than You Think! An Artifact Clouds Interpretation of Latane, Liu, Nowak, Bonevento, and Zheng's Results
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1999; 25(8): 1045 - 1048.
[Abstract] [PDF]