Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willams, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by FormyDuval, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Willams, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by FormyDuval, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 8, 818-826 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218004
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Psychological Importance of the "Big Five": Impression Formation and Context Effects

John E. Willams

Wake Forest University

Marci L. Munick

Wake Forest University

Jose L. Saiz

Wake Forest University

Deborah L. FormyDuval

Wake Forest University

In Study 1, university students rated the 300 items of the Adjective Check List for "psychological importance. " Adjectives representing the factors Extraversion (E) and Agreeableness (A) were judged more important than adjectives representing Emotional Stability (S), Conscientiousness (C), and Openness (0). In Study 2, graduate faculty members rated hypothetical applicants described with adjectives representing different combinations of the five factors. Contrary to predictions, applicants described with E and A adjectives were viewed less positively than applicants described with C and 0 adjectives, who were not viewed differently from applicants described by all five factors. In Study 3, university students rated the 300 adjectives for psychological importance in one of two contexts: working relationships or personal relationships. The results suggested that the unexpected results of Study 2 were obtained because the graduate faculty members viewed the applicants in the context of working rather than personal relationships.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. M. Donahue and K. Harary
The Patterned Inconsistency of Traits: Mapping the Differential Effects of Social Roles on Self-Perceptions of the Big Five
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1998; 24(6): 610 - 619.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Y. MOON and C. NASS
How "Real" Are Computer Personalities?: Psychological Responses to Personality Types in Human-Computer Interaction
Communication Research, December 1, 1996; 23(6): 651 - 674.
[Abstract]