This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dovidio, J. F. Articles by Lowrance, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dovidio, J. F. Articles by Lowrance, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size

Colgate University

Samuel L. Gaertner

University of Delaware

Alice M. Isen

Cornell University

Robert Lowrance

Colgate University

This study examined how social (group size: two, three, or four persons), appearance (similar or dissimilar dress), and affective (positive or neutral mood) factors can influence social categorization and, consequently, intergroup bias. As expected, positive affect increased the extent to which subjects formed inclusive group representations, anticipating that the members of two groups would feel like one, superordinate group. Also as predicted, subjects in dissimilarly dressed groups expected the memberships to feel less like one group. Consistent with the common in-group identity model, stronger superordinate group representations, in turn, predicted more positive out-group evaluations and lower levels of intergroup bias. The conceptual and applied implications of affect and social representations for improving intergroup relations are considered.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 8, 856-865 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Adil Saribay and S. M. Andersen Relational to Collective: Significant-Other Representations, Ethnic Categories, and Intergroup Perceptions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2007; 33(12): 1714 - 1726. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. Stone and R. J. Crisp Superordinate and Subgroup Identification as Predictors of Intergroup Evaluation in Common Ingroup Contexts Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 493 - 513. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Richardson Switching Social Identities:: The Influence of Editorial Framing on Reader Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action and African Americans Communication Research, August 1, 2005; 32(4): 503 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Prislin and P. N. Christensen The Effects of Social Change Within a Group on Membership Preferences: To Leave or Not to Leave? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2005; 31(5): 595 - 609. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Stroessner, D. M. Mackie, and V. Michalsen Positive Mood and the Perception of Variability Within and Between Groups Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2005; 8(1): 5 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Glaman, A. P. Jones, and R. M. Rozelle The Effects of Co-Worker Simiilarity on the Emergence of Affect in Work Teams Group Organization Management, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 192 - 215. [Abstract]