Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meliema, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bassili, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meliema, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bassili, J. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 9, 885-892 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295219002
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

On the Relationship between Attitudes and Values: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Self-Monitoring and Self-Monitoring Schematicity

Angelika Meliema

University of Toronto, Scarborough

John N. Bassili

University of Toronto, Scarborough

The moderating effect of self-monitoring on the relation between values and attitudes, and the extent to which self-monitoring schematicity accentuates this relationship were examined in a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATJ) survey. Subjects were polled on two policy issues, on their endorsement of values related to these issues, and on their self-monitoring tendencies. Response latency to the self-monitoring questions formed the self-monitoring schematicity index. Values predicted attitudes to a greater extent for low than for high self-monitors. Moreover, individuals who quickly answered questions about their self-monitoring tendencies (schematic low and high self-monitors) behaved more consistently with the tenets of the construct than individuals who answered the questions slowly. The implications of these results for theorizing about the influence of values on attitudes and for the role of schematicity in self-assessment in the personality domain are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. C. Wheeler, K. G. DeMarree, and R. E. Petty
Understanding the Role of the Self in Prime-to-Behavior Effects: The Active-Self Account
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2007; 11(3): 234 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. M. Thrash, A. J. Elliot, and O. C. Schultheiss
Methodological and Dispositional Predictors of Congruence Between Implicit and Explicit Need for Achievement
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 961 - 974.
[Abstract] [PDF]