Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Roese, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Roese, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 9, 908-913 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295219005
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Perceived Funniness of Humorous Stimuli

James M. Olson

University of Western Ontario

Neal J. Roese

Northwestern University

The authors tested the logic that perceivers infer the emotion-eliciting qualities of stimuli from (a) their emotional reactions and (b) information about environmental factors. A total of l50 men and women listened to a humorous monologue. Some subjects were instructed before listening to the monologue to inhibit their mirth; other subjects were told after listening to the monologue that the laboratory setting inhibits mirth; and control subjects were given no special instructions. Subjects who were instructed to inhibit their mirth smiled and laughed less often than control subjects, but their ratings of the monologue's funniness were similar to those of control subjects. Subjects who were told that the laboratory setting inhibited mirth smiled and laughed the same as control subjects, but they rated the monologue as funnier than did control subjects (an augmentation effect).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?