Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kruglanski, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ford, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kruglanski, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 9, 950-962 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167295219009
© 1995 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Effects of Epistemic Motivations on the Use of Accessible Constructs in Social Judgment

Thomas E. Ford

Western Michigan University

Arie W. Kruglanski

University of Maryland

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that the use of primed constructs to interpret target information will be increased under high need for closure and decreased under high need to avoid closure. Supporting this hypothesis, Experiment I found that subjects high in need for closure (induced by increasing cognitive load) were more likely to characterize an ambiguous target in terms of primed traits. Subjects high in need to avoid closure (induced by stressing the importance of impression accuracy) were less likely to characterize the target in terms of primed traits. Experiment 2 found that subjects high in dispositional need for closure were more likely to characterize the target in terms of primed traits than subjects low in dispositional need for closure. By grouping subjects based on individual differences in need for closure, Experiment 2 provides convergent validity for the hypothesis and rules out alternative interpretations for the results of Experiment 1.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. E. Petty, K. G. DeMarree, P. Brinol, J. Horcajo, and A. J. Strathman
Need for Cognition Can Magnify or Attenuate Priming Effects in Social Judgment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 900 - 912.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. Decoster and H. M. Claypool
A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 2 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. A. Stapel and W. Koomen
When We Wonder What it all Means: Interpretation Goals Facilitate Accessibility and Stereotyping Effects
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2001; 27(8): 915 - 929.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. A. Brannon and T. C. Brock
Scarcity Claims Elicit Extreme Responding to Persuasive Messages: Role of Cognitive Elaboration
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2001; 27(3): 365 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
T. E. Ford and E. P. Thompson
Preconscious and Postconscious Processes Underlying Construct Accessibility Effects: An Extended Search Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 317 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
N. Geva, J. Mayhar, and J. M. Skorick
The Cognitive Calculus of Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Experimental Assessment
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2000; 44(4): 447 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. A. Wyer, J. W. Sherman, and S. J. Stroessner
The Roles of Motivation and Ability in Controlling the Consequences of Stereotype Suppression
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2000; 26(1): 13 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W.-Y. Chun and H.-K. Lee
Effects of the Difference in the Amount of Group Preferential Information on Illusory Correlation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1999; 25(12): 1463 - 1475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. Richter and A. W. Kruglanski
Motivated Search for Common Ground: Need for Closure Effects on Audience Design in Interpersonal Communication
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1999; 25(9): 1101 - 1114.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. A. Blessum, C. G. Lord, and T. L. Sia
Cognitive Load and Positive Mood Reduce Typicality Effects in Attitude-Behavior Consistency
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1998; 24(5): 496 - 504.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. J. Monteith, J. W. Sherman, and P. G. Devine
Suppression as a Stereotype Control Strategy
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 1998; 2(1): 63 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]