Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McConnell, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fazio, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McConnell, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fazio, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1004-1013 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672962210003
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Women as Men and People: Effects of Gender-Marked Language

Allen R. McConnell

Pennsylvania State University

Russell H. Fazio

Indiana University

This study examined the implications of gender-marked language. It was hypothesized that man-suffix occupation titles (e.g., chairman) would lead perceivers to interpret a social target's personality as more masculine than no-suffix occupation titles (e.g., chair) and that person-suffix occupation titles (e.g., chairperson) would lead perceivers to interpret a social target's personality as less masculine than no-suffix occupation titles. Experiment 1 supported these predictions. Moreover, the effect was stronger for participants who reported more traditional gender role beliefs. Experiment 2 replicated this effect and showed that repeated exposure to occupation title suffixes (i.e., priming), coupled with the knowledge that the occupation title was chosen by the target (i.e., implicit personality effects), mediated the findings. In addition to explaining some of the cognitive underpinnings of sexist language, these results speak to conditions when priming will influence social perception.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
J. B. Parks and M. A. Roberton
Explaining Age and Gender Effects on Attitudes toward Sexist Language
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2005; 24(4): 401 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
E. L. Cralley and J. B. Ruscher
Lady, Girl, Female, or Woman: Sexism and Cognitive Busyness Predict Use of Gender-Biased Nouns
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2005; 24(3): 300 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
A. Mucchi-Faina
Visible or influential? Language reforms and gender (in)equality
Social Science Information, March 1, 2005; 44(1): 189 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]