Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stapel, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Spears, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stapel, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Spears, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 10, 979-992 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672962210001

Event Accessibility and Context Effects in Causal Inference: Judgment of a Different Order

Diederik A. Stapel

Center for Decision Research, Graduate School of Business University of Chicago sp-stapel1macmail.psy.uva.nl

Russell Spears

University of Amsterdam

Two studies examine how the influence of an accessible context event affects causal judgments of an ambiguous target as a function of the order in which the two events are explained. It is proposed that whether judgment of a target event is contrasted from or assimilated toward the implications of a context event depends on the distinctness of the context information at the time of judgment. Results supported the prediction that when participants were required to judge a context event before a target event, the context event would be perceived as more distinct, leading to comparison and contrast, whereas the reverse judgmental order would render the same context event relatively indistinct and lead to assimilation. Findings are discussed in the light of literature on causal judgments and recent models of assimilation and contrast effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Spears, E. Gordijn, A. Dijksterhuis, and D. A. Stapel
Reaction in Action: Intergroup Contrast in Automatic Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2004; 30(5): 605 - 616.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. J. Seta, C. E. Seta, and T. Mcelroy
Attributional Biases in the Service of Stereotype Maintenance: A Schema-Maintenance Through Compensation Analysis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2003; 29(2): 151 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. A. Stapel and P. Winkielman
Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional Relevance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1998; 24(6): 634 - 646.
[Abstract]