Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Culture, Ideology, and Antifat Attitudes

Christian S. Crandall

University of Kansas crandall{at}statl.cc.ukans.edu

Rebecca Martinez

University of Florida

Research on antifat attitudes in the United States has shown the position of antifat attitudes in an ideological network and the importance of attributions of control to prejudice against fat people. To test the role of blame and ideology in antifat prejudice, the authors compared attitudes among students in the United States and Mexico. Mexican students were significantly less concerned about their own weight and more accepting of fat people than were U.S. students. Antifat attitudes in the United States were part of a social ideology that holds individuals responsible for their life outcomes and may derive from attributions of controllability over life events. Attributions of controllability were significantly less important in Mexico for predicting antifat attitudes, and antipathy toward fat people showed no evidence of being part of an ideological network. Prejudice toward fat people in the United States appears to have a significant ideological component.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 11, 1165-1176 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672962211007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
L. T. O'Brien, A. Blodorn, A. Alsbrooks, R. Dube, G. Adams, and J. C. Nelson
Understanding White Americans' Perceptions of Racism in Hurricane Katrina-Related Events
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2009; 12(4): 431 - 444.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
E. Mullen and L. J. Skitka
Comparing Americans' and Ukrainians' Allocations of Public Assistance: The Role of Affective Reactions in Helping Behavior
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2009; 40(2): 301 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
C. O. Stewart
Social cognition and discourse processing goals in the analysis of `ex-gay' rhetoric
Discourse Society, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 63 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. R. Kaiser, P. S. Dyrenforth, and N. Hagiwara
Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2006; 32(11): 1423 - 1536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. R. Levy, C.-y. Chiu, and Y.-y. Hong
Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. R. Levy, T. L. West, L. Ramirez, and D. M. Karafantis
The Protestant Work Ethic: A Lay Theory with Dual Intergroup Implications
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 95 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. T. O'Brien and B. Major
System-Justifying Beliefs and Psychological Well-Being: The Roles of Group Status and Identity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 1718 - 1729.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. R. Hebl and J. F. Dovidio
Promoting the "Social" in the Examination of Social Stigmas
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2005; 9(2): 156 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. R. Hebl, E. B. King, and J. Lin
The Swimsuit Becomes Us All: Ethnicity, Gender, and Vulnerability to Self-Objectification
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2004; 30(10): 1322 - 1331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
L. A. Zebrowitz, J.-M. Fellous, A. Mignault, and C. Andreoletti
Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2003; 7(3): 194 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. R. Hebl and L. M. Mannix
The Weight of Obesity in Evaluating Others: A Mere Proximity Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2003; 29(1): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. W. Livingston
What You See is What You Get: Systematic Variability in Perceptual-Based Social Judgment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2001; 27(9): 1086 - 1096.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. S. Crandall, S. D'Anello, N. Sakalli, E. Lazarus, G. W. Nejtardt, and N. T. Feather
An Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice: Anti-Fat Attitudes in Six Nations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2001; 27(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
T. Anesbury and M. Tiggemann
An attempt to reduce negative stereotyping of obesity in children by changing controllability beliefs
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2000; 15(2): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. T. Miller and K. T. Downey
A Meta-Analysis of Heavyweight and Self-Esteem
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 1999; 3(1): 68 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. R. Hebl and T. F. Heatherton
The Stigma of Obesity in Women: The Difference is Black and White
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1998; 24(4): 417 - 426.
[Abstract]