Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosmitzki, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kosmitzki, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 3, 238-248 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296223002
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Reaffirmation of Cultural Identity in Cross-Cultural Encounters

Corinne Kosmitzki

University of California, Berkeley

This study examined the relation between cultural contact and psychological aspects associated with cultural identity, as conceptualized in two research approaches: social identity theory and acculturation research. The groups studied were German and U.S. American individuals who either lived in the respective nonnative culture (biculturals) or had no direct contact (monoculturals). Participants provided information about their sociocultural backgrounds and their cultural experiences, and they rated how characteristic each of 120 trait-attributes was of themselves, their native cultural group, and their nonnative cultural group. They also rated the attributes' desirability. Comparisons between monocultural and bicultural groups revealed a reaffirmation effect. Compared with monoculturals, biculturals saw themselves as more similar to their native cultural group, they evaluated that particular group's attributes more positively, and they saw the two cultural groups as less similar to each other. Theoretical implications of the reaffirmation effect are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 364 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. A. Shaffer, D. A. Harrison, K. M. Gilley, and D. M. Luk
Struggling for balance amid turbulence on international assignments: work-family conflict, support and commitment
Journal of Management, February 1, 2001; 27(1): 99 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
N. M. Sussman
The Dynamic Nature of Cultural Identity Throughout Cultural Transitions: Why Home Is Not So Sweet
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 355 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]