Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Folger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 5, 435-441 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296225001
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Elaborating Procedural Fairness: Justice Becomes Both Simpler and more Complex

Robert Folger

Tulane University

Russell Cropanzano

Colorado State University

Thomas A. Timmerman

Tulane University

John C. Howes

Colorado State University

David Mitchell

Southern Methodist University

Past research has indicated the importance of disputant voice in determining the fairness of conflict resolution procedures, but some conflicting data have called the role of voice into question. The authors review the role of voice in procedural fairness and conclude that some of those negative results were due to a confounded research design. In three studies, this problem was corrected, and additional data were collected. Contrary to the earlier findings, results show that when other factors are equated, participants prefer the conflict resolution procedures that offer the most voice. The authors further note, however, that factors such as the role of the decision maker are also important in determining fairness.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
J. M. Phillips
Antecedents and Consequences of Procedural Justice Perceptions in Hierarchical Decision-Making Teams
Small Group Research, February 1, 2002; 33(1): 32 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
R. Cropanzano, H. Aguinis, M. Schminke, and D. L. Denham
Disputant Reactions to Managerial Conflict Resolution Tactics: A Comparison Among Argentina, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and the United States
Group Organization Management, June 1, 1999; 24(2): 124 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]