This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Monteith, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Monteith, M. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Contemporary Forms of Prejudice-Related Conflict: In Search of a Nutshell

University of Kentucky, mjmontl{at}pop.uky.edu

Racial ambivalence theory, modern racism theory, and research on prejudice-related discrepancies all suggest that many Whites have conflicting reactions to Blacks. The present research investigated whether these forms of prejudice-related conflict are distinct by determining (a) the extent of association among measures of each form of conflict and (b) the affective reactions associated with each form of conflict. Results revealed virtually no evidence of overlap among the measures of conflict, and scores on measures of each form of conflict were associated with unique patterns of affective reactions. Racial ambivalence was uniquely associated with heightened guilt and discomfort, prejudice-related discrepancies were uniquely associated with heightened guilt and reduced positive affect, and modern racism had no unique affective consequences. Theoretical and applied implications of the existence of numerous contemporary forms of prejudice-related conflict are discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 5, 461-473 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296225004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Noh, V. Kaspar, and K.A.S. Wickrama Overt and Subtle Racial Discrimination and Mental Health: Preliminary Findings for Korean Immigrants Am J Public Health, July 1, 2007; 97(7): 1269 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Federico Ideology and the Affective Structure of Whites' Racial Perceptions Public Opin Q, September 1, 2006; 70(3): 327 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Deitch, A. Barsky, R. M. Butz, S. Chan, A. P. Brief, and J. C. Bradley Subtle Yet Significant: The Existence and Impact of Everyday Racial Discrimination in the Workplace Human Relations, November 1, 2003; 56(11): 1299 - 1324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Saucier and C. T. Miller The Persuasiveness of Racial Arguments as a Subtle Measure of Racism Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1303 - 1315. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. W. Bell and V. M. Esses Ambivalence and Response Amplification: A Motivational Perspective Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2002; 28(8): 1143 - 1152. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. R. Maio, K. Greenland, M. Bernard, and V. M. Esses Effects of Intergroup Ambivalence on Information Processing: The Role of Physiological Arousal Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2001; 4(4): 355 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. R. Maio, F. D. Fincham, and E. J. Lycett Attitudinal Ambivalence Toward Parents and Attachment Style Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2000; 26(12): 1451 - 1464. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Beal, E. C. O'Neal, J. Ong, and J. B. Ruscher The Ways and Means of Interracial Aggression: Modern Racists' Use of Covert Retaliation Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(10): 1225 - 1238. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Monteith and G. L. Walters Egalitarianism, Moral Obligation, and Prejudice-Related Personal Standards Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1998; 24(2): 186 - 199. [Abstract]