Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaiken, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Biek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaiken, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 6, 547-556 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296226001
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Working Knowledge, Cognitive Processing, and Attitudes: On the Determinants of Bias

Michael Biek

Texas A&M University

Wendy Wood

Texas A&M University

Shelly Chaiken

New York University

This experiment demonstrated that attitude-relevant knowledge can enable biased or objective systematic processing of new information. Subjects having a high or low knowledge on AIDS risk prevention evaluated a series of scenarios estimating the likelihood of contracting AIDS from sexual behavior. Knowledgeable subjects who reported considerable fear of AIDS engaged in biased processing of the risk estimates. The intense affect apparently motivated these subjects to use their knowledge to bolster and defend their existing attitudes toward AIDS risk: They gave more favorable evaluations of risk estimates that supported their attitudes than estimates that opposed them. In contrast, knowledgeable subjects who reported only moderate AIDS fear did not appear motivated to assume a defensive stance and instead processed the AIDS risk estimates in a critical, objective manner regardless of the congruence with their own attitudes. Less knowledgeable subjects did not demonstrate either a biased or an objectively critical processing orientation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
L. Kahlor, S. Dunwoody, R. J. Griffin, and K. Neuwirth
Seeking and Processing Information about Impersonal Risk
Science Communication, December 1, 2006; 28(2): 163 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
C. Werch, J. L. Grenard, J. Burnett, J. A. Watkins, S. Ames, and E. Jobli
Translation as a function of modality: the potential of brief interventions.
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2006; 29(1): 89 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
H.-J. Mosler, K. Schwarz, F. Ammann, and H. Gutscher
Computer Simulation as a Method of Further Developing a Theory: Simulating the Elaboration Likelihood Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2001; 5(3): 201 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. H. Eagly, P. Kulesa, L. A. Brannon, K. Shaw, and S. Hutson-Comeaux
Why Counterattitudinal Messages Are as Memorable as Proattitudinal Messages: The Importance of Active Defense Against Attack
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(11): 1392 - 1408.
[Abstract] [PDF]