|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Intergroup Discrimination in Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations: Impact of Stimulus Valence, Relative Group Status, and Relative Group Size
Sabine Otten
Westfäilische Wilhelms-Universität, otten{at}psy.unimuenster.de
Amelie Mummendey
Westfäilische Wilhelms-Universität
Mathias Blanz
Westfäilische Wilhelms-Universität
Three studies investigated the determination of social discrimination by the valence of stimuli that are allocated between groups. The studies were based on either the minimal group paradigm or a more reality-based laboratory intergroup setting, with stimulus valence, group status, and group size as factors and with pull scores on Taifel matrices as dependent variables. In general, the results showed that group members did not discriminate against the out-group when allocating negative stimuli, where as for positive stimuli the typical in-group bias was found. However, those participants whose positive social identity was threatened by assigning them to inferior or minority groups showed an increased willingness to favor the in-group over the out-group in the allocation of both positive and negative stimuli.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 6,
568-581 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296226003
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
S. Moscatelli, F. Albarello, and M. Rubini
Linguistic Discrimination in Minimal Groups: The Impact of Status Differentials
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
June 1, 2008;
27(2):
140 - 154.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. von Hippel
When People Would Rather Switch Than Fight: Out-Group Favoritism Among Temporary Employees
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2006;
9(4):
533 - 546.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.-E. Petersen, J. Dietz, and D. Frey
The Effects of Intragroup Interaction and Cohesion on Intergroup Bias
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2004;
7(2):
107 - 118.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Y. Shah, P. C. Brazy, and E. T. Higgins
Promoting Us or Preventing Them: Regulatory Focus and Manifestations of Intergroup Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
April 1, 2004;
30(4):
433 - 446.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Amiot and R. Y. Bourhis
Discrimination and the Positive-Negative Asymmetry Effect: Ideological and Normative Processes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
May 1, 2003;
29(5):
597 - 608.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Wenzel, A. Mummendey, U. Weber, and S. Waldzus
The Ingroup as Pars Pro Toto: Projection From the Ingroup Onto the Inclusive Category as a Precursor to Social Discrimination
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
April 1, 2003;
29(4):
461 - 473.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Dobbs and W. D. Crano
Outgroup Accountability in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Implications for Aversive Discrimination and Social Identity Theory
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2001;
27(3):
355 - 364.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Mummendey, S. Otten, U. Berger, and T. Kessler
Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Valence of Evaluation and Salience of Categorization
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2000;
26(10):
1258 - 1270.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Mummendey and M. Wenzel
Social Discrimination and Tolerance in Intergroup Relations: Reactions to Intergroup Difference
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
May 1, 1999;
3(2):
158 - 174.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Jackson
How Variations in Social Structure Affect Different Types of Intergroup Bias and Different Dimensions of Social Identity in a Multi-Intergroup Setting
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 1999;
2(2):
145 - 173.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
