This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shaver, P. R. Articles by Nalbone, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Shaver, P. R. Articles by Nalbone, D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Androgyny and Attachment Security: Two Related Models of Optimal Personality

University of California, Davis, prshaver{at}ucdavis.edu

Daria Papalia

State University of New York at Albany

Catherine L. Clark

University of California, Davis

Lilah Raynor Koski

University of California, Davis

Marie C. Tidwell

State University of New York at Buffalo

David Nalbone

Claremont Graduate School

Three studies explored similarities between attachment style typologies and sex role typologies. Both are defined by pairs of dimensions: self model and other model (attachment styles); masculinity, or agency, and femininity, or communion (sex role orientations). Results indicate that although there are conceptual and empirical similarities between self model and masculinity (two operationalizations of "agency") and between other model and femininity (two operationalizations of "communion '9, the sex role renditions of agency and communion are more closely related to gender than are the attachment style renditions. The authors argue that attachment style dimensions and the personality ideal they help to define-attachment security-are closer than masculinity and femininity to what sex role researchers may have had in mind when they proposed the concept of psychological androgyny. Attachment security is, roughly speaking, androgyny minus the elements of power; aggression, and emotional vulnerability that are inadvertently retained when agency and communion are defined in terms of gender-linked traits.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Fischer Parental Relationship Quality and Masculine Gender-Role Strain in Young Men: Mediating Effects of Personality The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2007; 35(2): 328 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Bartz and J. E. Lydon Close Relationships and the Working Self-Concept: Implicit and Explicit Effects of Priming Attachment on Agency and Communion Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2004; 30(11): 1389 - 1401. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Simpson, W. S. Rholes, M. M. Orina, and J. Grich Working Models of Attachment, Support Giving, and Support Seeking in a Stressful Situation Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2002; 28(5): 598 - 608. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Miller Attachment Models and Memory for Conversation Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2001; 18(3): 404 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Kenny, R. Lomax, M. Brabeck, and J. Fife Longitudinal Pathways Linking Adolescent Reports of Maternal and Paternal Attachments to Psychological Well-Being The Journal of Early Adolescence, August 1, 1998; 18(3): 221 - 243. [Abstract]

				K. A. Brennan and J. K. Bosson Attachment-Style Differences in Attitudes toward and Reactions to Feedback from Romantic Partners: An Exploration of the Relational Bases of Self-Esteem Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1998; 24(7): 699 - 714. [Abstract]