Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittenbrink, B.
Right arrow Articles by Henly, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wittenbrink, B.
Right arrow Articles by Henly, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 6, 598-610 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296226005
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Creating Social Reality: Informational Social Influence and the Content of Stereotypic Beliefs

Bernd Wittenbrink

University of Michigan, bwittenbrink{at}clipr.colorado.edu

Julia R. Henly

University of California, Los Angeles

Three experiments tested the hypothesis that comparison information about other people's stereotypic beliefs is used to validate personal beliefs about a target group. A simple manipulation of questionnaire items and their response scales, presented as part of a political opinion survey, served as social comparison information regarding beliefs about African Americans. The comparison information influenced participants' subsequently measured beliefs about group as well as their evaluation of a Black target. When provided with negative comparison information, participants reported more negative racial beliefs and a more negative evaluation of the Black target than when provided with positive feedback. Moreover; this effect depended on participants' initial stereotypic beliefs. Only participants with initially negative beliefs about the target group were influenced by the comparison information; participants with relatively positive beliefs were not.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. E. Ford, C. F. Boxer, J. Armstrong, and J. R. Edel
More Than "Just a Joke": The Prejudice-Releasing Function of Sexist Humor
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2008; 34(2): 159 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
S. G. Mitchell, J. A. Peterson, and C. A. Latkin
The impact of drug use on perceptions of credibility in indigenous outreach workers.
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2006; 16(8): 1108 - 1119.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
T. E. Ford and M. A. Ferguson
Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor: A Prejudiced Norm Theory
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. Stangor, G. B. Sechrist, and J. T. Jost
Changing Racial Beliefs by Providing Consensus Information
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2001; 27(4): 486 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. E. Ford
Effects of Sexist Humor on Tolerance of Sexist Events
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(9): 1094 - 1107.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Coats and E. R. Smith
Perceptions of Gender Subtypes: Sensitivity to Recent Exemplar Activation and In-Group/Out-Group Differences
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1999; 25(4): 516 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]