Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 9, 868-881 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296229002
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Self-Perceptions of Fairness in Individual and Group Contexts

Lisa Farwell

University of California, Los Angeles

Bernard Weiner

University of California, Los Angeles

Six studies explored self-enhancing beliefs about own fairness relative to others. Persons reported that it is fair to base punishment on a transgressor's responsibility for his or her actions, that they base their rewards and punishments more strongly on a target's responsibility than do others, and that others, but not the self; reward and punish in-group and out-group members differently. Collectively, these results reveal that persons define their own superior fairness in terms of judicious use of responsibility information and lack of bias. In contrast, own assistance to the terminally ill was not described as more strongly based on responsibility, suggesting that definitions of fairness shift depending on context. Finally, persons consistently described themselves as relatively benevolent. Results are discussed in relation to expressions of intergroup bias and the maintenance of fairness self perceptions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. A. Vandello, N. P. Goldschmied, and D. A. R. Richards
The Appeal of the Underdog
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2007; 33(12): 1603 - 1616.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. Farwell and B. Weiner
Bleeding Hearts and the Heartless: Popular Perceptions of Liberal and Conservative Ideologies
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2000; 26(7): 845 - 852.
[Abstract] [PDF]