Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flippen, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flippen, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 9, 882-893 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296229003
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

A Comparison of Similarity and Interdependence as Triggers for In-Group Formation

Annette R. Flippen

Teachers College, Columbia University

Harvey A. Hornstein

Teachers College, Columbia University

William E. Siegal

Teachers College, Columbia University

Eben A. Weitzman

University of Massachusetts-Boston

In four experiments, subjects were informed of a threat from various sources to members of a social category to which they belonged. They were also given the opportunity to help a target person. The results of the first two experiments showed that in-group bias occurred only when the threat was from a social source rather than a nonsocial source or when there was no threat. The third experiment showed that the bias favored only those similar on the threatened category rather than those similar on another non-threatened category. The fourth experiment showed that when subjects knew the source of the threat, the bias was against only members of the threatening group, even when the threat was attributed to similar others. These findings indicate that interdependence resulting from a shared threat, rather than similarity alone, seems to play a key role in the formation of in-group boundaries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Levine, A. Prosser, D. Evans, and S. Reicher
Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2005; 31(4): 443 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
K. B. Henry, H. Arrow, and B. Carini
A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement
Small Group Research, October 1, 1999; 30(5): 558 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. R. Flippen
Understanding Groupthink from a Self-Regulatory Perspective
Small Group Research, April 1, 1999; 30(2): 139 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]